Difference between revisions of "WikiDB/Roadmap"

From TestWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Some more todos)
(Planned features (in progress): + aliases)
 
(53 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is an (incomplete) list of features and bugs that need fixing for v1.
+
<div class="Information">
 +
; Do not add new feature requests to this page.
 +
: This page represents my own roadmap and should be maintained only by me.  Instead, use one of the following pages:
 +
:* Use '''[[WikiDB/Feature requests]]''' to request a new feature.
 +
:* Use '''[[WikiDB/Bugs]]''' to report a bug.
 +
</div>
  
== Administration ==
+
This page contains the current roadmap for WikiDB.  The list represents some of the things that I am currently exploring and my aspirations for future development, but it is unlikely to be a complete list and may not always be kept up-to-date as things evolve.
  
* Update tables when page is moved.
+
<div class="Warning">
* Update tables when page is deleted.
+
'''Warning:''' This page does ''not'' guarantee that the suggested features will ever be implemented, nor does it indicate my development priorities - it simply represents my current thinking about the features I would like to add, in no particular order.
* Update tables when page is undeleted.
+
</div>
* (check that rollbacks work)
+
* 'What links here' should show templates that are included via data tags.
+
  
== Syntax ==
+
There are also good ideas from other people scattered around the wiki, particularly on the [[WikiDB/Feature requests|feature requests page]].  Some of those suggestions get incorporated into this page, if there is a clear benefit and no obvious barriers to implementation.  Any ideas that have not been added to this page are still contenders for inclusion (particularly if demand is high); they are just not at the front of my mind.
 +
 
 +
== Planned features (in progress) ==
 +
 
 +
=== Table definitions ===
 +
 
 +
* Allow foreign keys to be defined.
 +
* Allow 'closed' tables (where all data is supplied on the schema page), as a method for implementing Enum fields.
 +
 
 +
=== Data types ===
 +
 
 +
* Introduce new class-based method for defining data types (custom and internal) to improve code re-use and to make it easier to add new features.
 +
* Allow aliases to be specified (e.g. <code>int</code> and <code>integer</code>).  Currently you need to define the same type multiple times if you want this.
 +
* Add 'date' data-type.
 +
 
 +
=== Querying back-end ===
 +
 
 +
* Allow JOINS in queries.
 +
* Add support for boolean NOT operator (AND, OR and XOR are implemented, but NOT is unary and therefore trickier).
 +
* Add support for LIKE comparisons?
 +
* Add support for REGEX comparisons?
 +
* Add support for OFFSET/LIMIT.
 +
* Add support for field lists and DISTINCT clause.
 +
* Add support for calculated fields.
 +
* Add support for custom functions.
 +
 
 +
=== Syntax ===
 +
 
 +
* Formalise syntax for referring to identifiers and literals.
 +
* <code>&lt;repeat&gt;</code> tag:
 +
** Allow LIMIT argument (or maybe 'range'), possibly with pagination.
 +
** Add ability to specify field list and limit to DISTINCT rows.
 +
* <code>&lt;data&gt;</code> tag:
 +
** Provide a mechanism for 'pass-through' parameters (i.e. parameters that are supplied to the template, but which don't get added to the table).  Suggestion is to prefix the name with an exclamation mark.  Alternatively, an underscore could be used, as this is already reserved in table definitions, and therefore is not allowed in data tags (though this is not enforced) - may kill two birds with one stone...
 +
** Allow multi-line field data.
 +
 
 +
=== Interface ===
 +
 
 +
* Highlight 'bad' data on the table's data page.
 +
* Add special page to list all defined data types.
 +
* 'What links here' should show templates that are included via data tags.
  
* Better data syntax:  Need to allow multiple rows in a single definition.
+
=== Internals ===
** Also, data definitions in a DB namespace shouldn't require the 'table' attribute (default to current).
+
* Repeat tag syntax: a lot of decisions need to be made before this can be finalised, but some specifics:
+
** Contents of repeat tag will be repeated for each row.
+
** Ability to have header/footer?
+
** Can't use &gt; in attribute values, e.g. criteria="Field>Value", as it cripples parser.  Need to decide how to specify criteria.
+
*** Criteria syntax in general - how detailed can we get?
+
* Field names need to be limited to 255 chars (DB limit)
+
* Field names need to have leading underscores removed (Reserved for special uses)
+
  
== Code Tidying ==
+
* Code Tidying:
 +
** Add profiling statements.
 +
* Internationalisation:
 +
** Allow type names to be translated.
 +
** Allow type aliases to be translated.
 +
** Allow tag names to be translated?
 +
** Allow data to be translated?
  
* Ensure all user-visible text uses the message cache.
+
== Other possible features (speculative) ==
* Add profiling statements.
+
These are some thoughts on later developments, for further down the line.
  
== Misc ==
+
=== Interface ===
 +
* Form-based data entry.
  
* References to tables in table="..." attributes should follow redirects.  This allows tables to be moved without screwing everything up!
+
=== Data linking ===
 +
* Ability to specify joins between tables.
 +
* Able to specify relationships between data, e.g. 'is a type of'

Latest revision as of 17:35, 19 August 2021

Do not add new feature requests to this page.
This page represents my own roadmap and should be maintained only by me. Instead, use one of the following pages:

This page contains the current roadmap for WikiDB. The list represents some of the things that I am currently exploring and my aspirations for future development, but it is unlikely to be a complete list and may not always be kept up-to-date as things evolve.

Warning: This page does not guarantee that the suggested features will ever be implemented, nor does it indicate my development priorities - it simply represents my current thinking about the features I would like to add, in no particular order.

There are also good ideas from other people scattered around the wiki, particularly on the feature requests page. Some of those suggestions get incorporated into this page, if there is a clear benefit and no obvious barriers to implementation. Any ideas that have not been added to this page are still contenders for inclusion (particularly if demand is high); they are just not at the front of my mind.

Planned features (in progress)[edit]

Table definitions[edit]

  • Allow foreign keys to be defined.
  • Allow 'closed' tables (where all data is supplied on the schema page), as a method for implementing Enum fields.

Data types[edit]

  • Introduce new class-based method for defining data types (custom and internal) to improve code re-use and to make it easier to add new features.
  • Allow aliases to be specified (e.g. int and integer). Currently you need to define the same type multiple times if you want this.
  • Add 'date' data-type.

Querying back-end[edit]

  • Allow JOINS in queries.
  • Add support for boolean NOT operator (AND, OR and XOR are implemented, but NOT is unary and therefore trickier).
  • Add support for LIKE comparisons?
  • Add support for REGEX comparisons?
  • Add support for OFFSET/LIMIT.
  • Add support for field lists and DISTINCT clause.
  • Add support for calculated fields.
  • Add support for custom functions.

Syntax[edit]

  • Formalise syntax for referring to identifiers and literals.
  • <repeat> tag:
    • Allow LIMIT argument (or maybe 'range'), possibly with pagination.
    • Add ability to specify field list and limit to DISTINCT rows.
  • <data> tag:
    • Provide a mechanism for 'pass-through' parameters (i.e. parameters that are supplied to the template, but which don't get added to the table). Suggestion is to prefix the name with an exclamation mark. Alternatively, an underscore could be used, as this is already reserved in table definitions, and therefore is not allowed in data tags (though this is not enforced) - may kill two birds with one stone...
    • Allow multi-line field data.

Interface[edit]

  • Highlight 'bad' data on the table's data page.
  • Add special page to list all defined data types.
  • 'What links here' should show templates that are included via data tags.

Internals[edit]

  • Code Tidying:
    • Add profiling statements.
  • Internationalisation:
    • Allow type names to be translated.
    • Allow type aliases to be translated.
    • Allow tag names to be translated?
    • Allow data to be translated?

Other possible features (speculative)[edit]

These are some thoughts on later developments, for further down the line.

Interface[edit]

  • Form-based data entry.

Data linking[edit]

  • Ability to specify joins between tables.
  • Able to specify relationships between data, e.g. 'is a type of'